SCROLL
You Tube video explanation of store:
https://youtu.be/Ty6cNX4cxEk?si=f87KVVH1_iblc4RL
________________________________
James got full custody of his pictured daughter in 2001 (when she was 7 months old). He proves this by showing some of his actual WINNING orders in family court and the Court of Appeals. See here in my "Flow Page" link below:
https://flow.page/fathersrights
________________________________
In the store below, there is a step-by- step video for sale, covering the Rules of Evidence (the most important item herein). Then there's James' winning packets... samples of motions, briefs, notes and arguments that took him hours, weeks and months to compile. When you select an item there, is a short description of what's in each packet/vid.
This is packet to fight against corrupt investigators, parenting evaluators, CASA, family court investigators and GAL's, even though GAL is the main focus, they all are doing the same type of thing.... just another person trying to be a witness among many in a court case. They deserve to be treated as ONLY a witness and not the end-all, be-all of court truth.
I got ALL reports by GAL's thrown out or not considered. The 1st GAL on my case, recommended that the mother NOT be found in contempt of court. I won. The court ignored the GAL. You can see my contempt winning order with the signatures of the mom's and the GAL. When the parties settled out of court, the GAL recommended I take domestic violence classes. The court disregarded her. My custody order on my FlowPage link also shows her signature and no DV order. Another GAL wrote a report to increase the mother's time with child. I totally discredited her. The judge said the GAL had no credibility. That transcript is also on my FlowPage link here: https://www.flowcode.com/page/howigotcustody
Included in this packet are my notes with a bundle of case law in WA state on how courts DON'T have to listen to GAL's and can ignore them. Also is a sample of a thorough attack/response to a bogus GAL report. There is also a sample of a Motion to Remove GAL, a bar association article on GAL's and more.
Your state does not have to follow the lead of WA case law, but they can consider it and use it as a guide in their discretion. The packet includes arguments you rarely see lodged against GAL's and in my and many other cases, it worked. The content alone is worth the price as far as the model, format and structure of arguing against a GAL... instead of bowing down and worshipping them like they are an oracle of truth.... like most people do.